Oklahoma Lawmaker Renews Push for Pay Raise Vote Requirement
- mike33692

- 5 hours ago
- 2 min read

Oklahoma Lawmaker Renews Push to Require Voters to Approve Legislative Pay Raises
Rep. Rick West Revives Resolution on Lawmaker Salaries
Representative Rick West, a Republican from Heavener, says he's once again filing a resolution that would require Oklahoma voters — not lawmakers — to approve any future pay raises for state legislators. The proposal comes amid ongoing scrutiny of the Oklahoma Legislative Compensation Board, the group tasked with reviewing and recommending lawmaker salaries.
Under current law, the board — not the Legislature — can authorize salary increases. In recent years, this has led to criticism after legislative pay was raised despite concerns about transparency and accountability. West’s resolution would not eliminate the board, but it would require the board to publicly explain and justify why lawmakers should receive a raise.
How the Process Works Today
The Legislative Compensation Board meets every two years to evaluate whether legislative pay is adequate. The current annual salary for Oklahoma lawmakers is $69,021, one of the higher legislative salaries in the region. Supporters say the pay helps attract qualified candidates; opponents argue raises should reflect performance and public confidence.
West has filed similar measures in past sessions, but they did not advance. This new version comes at a time when Oklahoma voters increasingly demand input on issues involving government spending.
A Push for Voter Oversight
If passed, West’s resolution would place a state question on the ballot asking voters whether legislative salary increases should require a public vote. Because it is a resolution, not a bill, the governor’s signature would not be required.
All bills and resolutions must be filed by January 15, 2026, meaning West’s measure must be finalized ahead of the next legislative session.
Supporters say the change would ensure lawmakers remain accountable to taxpayers. Critics say it could politicize compensation and create challenges in recruiting candidates who rely on the income.





Comments