top of page
KDG OPFC Great Plains Web Banner Ad-1 V1.jpg

Ardmore Flock Cameras Head to February 2027 Vote

Writer: mike33692
mike33692
4 hours ago
3 min read
Crowded public meeting in a council chamber, with attendees facing officials at a long dais under bright ceiling lights.
photo credit/KTEN

Ardmore Flock Cameras to Remain Active Until February 2027 Public Vote

Ardmore voters will decide the future of the city's Flock security cameras in February 2027, following a unanimous vote by the Ardmore City Commission to place the controversial surveillance system before residents in a special election.

The commission voted 5-0 on September 21, 2026, to let voters determine whether the city should continue using the cameras. However, commissioners rejected a separate proposal to cover the devices until the election, meaning all 23 Flock cameras will remain operational while the community prepares to vote.

Ardmore Flock Cameras Head to February 2027 Election

The decision follows weeks of public disagreement over the city's contract with Flock Safety, a company that provides automated license plate recognition and other public safety technology.

In August, commissioners voted 3-1 to renew the city's Flock contract, prompting criticism from residents who believed the decision should have included greater public input.

A petition seeking to recall four city commissioners followed the contract renewal.

The controversy eventually brought the issue back before the commission at its September 21 meeting, where officials considered both a special election and a temporary suspension of the cameras.

The city's September 21 commission agenda  included consideration of placing the Flock Safety Camera System on a special election ballot and temporarily suspending its operation pending the outcome.

Commissioners unanimously supported allowing residents to make the final decision.

The special election is planned for February 2027, although the specific election date and final ballot language were not provided in the information released about the meeting.

The public vote will give Ardmore residents an opportunity to decide whether the city should continue using the camera system rather than leaving that decision solely with elected officials.

Commissioners Split Over Keeping 23 Cameras Operational

Although commissioners agreed on holding an election, they disagreed over whether the cameras should continue operating in the meantime.

Commissioner Buddy Simon argued that Ardmore should return to the way its police department operated before the cameras were installed.

“We need to take the cameras out of Ardmore!” Simon said during the discussion.

Simon and Vice Mayor Sheryl Ellis supported covering the cameras until residents could vote.

Mayor David Plesher and Commissioners Nancy Sjulin and John Credle opposed temporarily disabling the system.

The proposal to cover the cameras failed 3-2, leaving the existing network in operation.

According to information provided by the Ardmore Police Department, the city currently has 23 Flock cameras.

Of those, 13 are positioned at entrances and exits around Ardmore, where they can capture license plate information from passing vehicles.

The remaining 10 cameras are integrated with gunshot detection technology in the northeast and southeast portions of the city.

The Ardmore Police Department  uses public safety technology as part of its law enforcement operations, although the upcoming election will determine whether the current Flock system remains part of those operations.

For now, residents should expect the cameras to continue functioning as they have under the city's existing agreement.

Public Safety and Privacy Concerns Drive Ardmore Camera Debate

The dispute over the Ardmore Flock cameras centers on two competing concerns: the potential value of surveillance technology in criminal investigations and residents' expectations of privacy and government transparency.

Supporters of the system argue that automated license plate readers can help law enforcement identify vehicles associated with criminal investigations, locate stolen vehicles and develop leads more quickly.

Opponents question how vehicle information is collected, stored and shared, and whether the public had sufficient opportunity to evaluate the technology before the city renewed its contract.

Those concerns are not limited to Ardmore. Communities across the country have debated how automated license plate recognition systems should be used and what safeguards should govern access to the information they collect.

Flock Safety describes its license plate recognition technology  as a tool for helping law enforcement identify vehicles connected to public safety investigations.

The technology's capabilities, however, are separate from the local policy questions Ardmore voters will consider, including whether the city should continue operating the network and under what conditions.

The February election will follow months of debate over the original contract renewal, the recall petition and the commission's decision to leave the cameras active.

Until voters make their decision, Ardmore's 23 Flock cameras will remain in place and operational.

Comments


bottom of page