NextEra Winter Storm Uri Ruling Finds Marketer Liable in Oklahoma
NextEra Winter Storm Uri Ruling Finds Energy Marketer Liable for Oklahoma Natural Gas Price Increases
An Osage County judge has ruled that NextEra Energy Marketing violated Oklahoma law by charging excessive natural gas prices during Winter Storm Uri, handing Attorney General Gentner Drummond a major victory in the state's continuing effort to recover money from energy marketers over the February 2021 storm. District Judge Stuart Tate granted the state's motion for partial summary judgment, finding NextEra liable under both the Oklahoma Emergency Price Stabilization Act and the Oklahoma Consumer Protection Act.
The NextEra Winter Storm Uri ruling resolves a major question of liability but does not determine how much the company could ultimately owe. A future trial will address damages, including alleged overcharges, restitution and disgorgement, as Oklahoma continues litigation stemming from natural gas costs that were ultimately passed to utility customers after the historic freeze.
NextEra Winter Storm Uri Ruling Finds Violations of Two Oklahoma Laws
Drummond announced the decision September 29, saying the Osage County District Court had found NextEra legally responsible for violations arising from its natural gas pricing during the storm.
The Attorney General's official announcement of the NextEra ruling confirms Tate granted partial summary judgment under both state laws while leaving the amount of damages for trial.
Winter Storm Uri brought prolonged subfreezing temperatures to Oklahoma in February 2021 while simultaneously disrupting natural gas production and sending demand sharply higher.
The state alleges energy marketers took advantage of those conditions by manipulating available supply and creating what investigators have characterized as a short squeeze in the natural gas market.
According to the Attorney General's investigation, natural gas that normally traded at approximately $3 per unit surged as high as $1,200 per unit during the emergency.
Oklahoma's Emergency Price Stabilization Act generally restricts substantial price increases for goods and services during a declared emergency unless the seller can demonstrate that the increase resulted from legitimate market conditions or factors unrelated to the emergency.
The state's Emergency Price Stabilization Act generally prohibits covered prices from increasing more than 10% during an emergency and for 30 days afterward, subject to statutory exceptions that include increases attributable to petroleum and natural gas commodity markets.
The dispute with NextEra therefore centered not simply on whether natural gas prices increased during Uri, but whether the prices charged could lawfully be justified by legitimate market conditions.
The court's partial summary judgment means the judge determined the state established liability on the claims addressed without requiring a trial on that portion of the case.
FERC Dismissal Keeps Oklahoma Lawsuit in State Court
The ruling came less than a week after NextEra lost a separate effort involving federal regulators.
NextEra had petitioned the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, seeking federal jurisdiction over issues raised in Oklahoma's lawsuit.
FERC dismissed that petition on September 23, clearing a potential jurisdictional obstacle and allowing the state litigation to continue.
The Oklahoma Attorney General's announcement of the FERC dismissal said the decision ensured the case could continue moving forward in Oklahoma.
The jurisdiction question matters because natural gas markets operate across a complicated mix of state and federal regulation.
FERC regulates interstate transmission and wholesale energy markets within its jurisdiction, while Oklahoma maintains authority over state consumer protection laws and portions of the intrastate natural gas system.
Drummond has argued that the conduct challenged in the Oklahoma lawsuits falls within state law and should be resolved in Oklahoma courts.
The Attorney General has pursued multiple energy marketers over Uri pricing, alleging that companies artificially restricted natural gas supplies or otherwise manipulated market conditions as demand surged.
Those lawsuits have since been consolidated, making the NextEra decision potentially significant beyond a single defendant as the broader litigation proceeds.
Drummond began filing the cases after taking office, arguing that an investigation of the 2021 storm uncovered evidence that some marketers profited from artificial scarcity rather than simply responding to genuine weather-driven market conditions.
Billions in Winter Storm Costs Remain an Issue for Oklahoma Ratepayers
The financial consequences of Winter Storm Uri did not end when temperatures returned to normal.
Oklahoma utilities incurred extraordinary fuel costs during the storm as natural gas prices surged, creating obligations too large to place immediately on monthly utility bills.
State lawmakers responded by creating a financing mechanism allowing regulated utilities to spread qualifying storm costs over decades rather than collecting them from customers all at once.
The result means many Oklahoma utility customers continue paying charges associated with the 2021 winter storm years after the event itself.
That continuing financial impact is one reason the state's lawsuits against natural gas marketers have attracted significant attention.
Drummond argues that money recovered through the litigation should ultimately benefit the Oklahomans who absorbed the costs.
"This ruling marks an important victory in our fight to hold NextEra accountable for the staggering prices Oklahomans were forced to pay during Winter Storm Uri," Drummond said following the ruling.
The Attorney General has maintained that extreme weather can legitimately cause energy prices to increase but argues that market volatility does not protect companies from liability if prices were manipulated or contractual obligations were violated.
His office reiterated that position earlier this year when it announced renewed monitoring of Oklahoma natural gas markets during extreme cold, specifically citing lessons learned from Winter Storm Uri.
The NextEra decision does not yet establish a final dollar judgment.
The next stage will determine the financial consequences of the violations, including the amount of any overcharges, restitution or profits that could be ordered returned through disgorgement.
Other consolidated Winter Storm Uri litigation also remains pending.
The NextEra Winter Storm Uri ruling nevertheless marks a significant step for Oklahoma because liability has now been established against one of the energy marketers targeted by the state, shifting the NextEra case toward the question of how much money may ultimately be recovered.
Comments